DESIRE Information Gateways Handbook
HomeTable of contentsAuthors-
Search | Help   
-2.11. Distributed cataloguing

In this chapter...
 
  • advantages of distributed cataloguing
  • distributed cataloguing models
  • management issues
  • a case study: SOSIG
  • examples of distributed cataloguing
Introduction
 

This chapter introduces the concept of distributed cataloguing and the potential for working collaboratively across the Internet. It looks at some of the human issues involved in distributing cataloguing effort, presents some models currently in use within information gateways and in particular looks at the experiences of SOSIG in employing a distributed model. Some further examples of distributed cataloguing models are also presented.

Because of the open nature of the Web there is considerable potential for distributed collaborative cataloguing of networked resources. Information gateways can be built by teams of staff who are geographically dispersed but who can add resources to a database from their desktops via the WWW. This chapter concentrates mainly on issues surrounding distributed cataloguing into a central database. However, an additional or even complementary model is that of collaborative work with other gateways (see the chapter on co-operation for more details).

Cross reference
Co-operation between gateways

Why would an information gateway want to consider distributed cataloguing?

Distributing the cataloguing effort allows you potentially to share the responsibility with a number of organisations or participants and to maximise the coverage of the collection. In particular it allows gateways to:

  • locate cataloguing effort within centres of subject expertise
  • locate cataloguing effort within centres of geographical knowledge
  • provide access to staff with a variety of language capabilities, enabling the development of multilingual gateways
  • aid economies of scale

Models for distributed cataloguing
 

There are numerous cataloguing models currently being employed by information gateways. The main contrast is that of the use of paid versus voluntary effort. However, even within this broad division there are several approaches, e.g.:

  • networks of volunteers
  • institutional commitment to provide staff effort as part of their main duties
  • paid staff
  • a mixture of paid staff and volunteers

And within these organisational setups there are various ways of assigning roles and responsibilities. These range from allowing members of the team to have full responsibilities and access to the database to a very defined division of labour between selecting, evaluating and cataloguing resources.

DESIRE 1 held a training workshop on the Distributed Cataloguing Model in 1997, which brought together staff from a number of European information gateways to share experiences of their models and the tools, training materials and methods of delivery to support them. A report summarising the outcome of the workshop can be found at:

http://www.desire.org/results/training/D8-2af.html


Management issues
 

There are a number of issues to consider when setting up a distributed cataloguing system.

Recruitment

One of the most crucial issues for gateways is recruiting the right staff to work on the catalogue. The core skills of resource selection and cataloguing make librarians ideally placed to assume the role, as they have the training and the expertise required. However, academic subject experts or others with the appropriate subject knowledge may also be valuable. It is also important to bear in mind that as well as subject knowledge a fair degree of expertise in use of the Internet is also necessary and that these two skills are not always found together.

As well as deciding on the type of person required, gateways will also need to consider the best approach to finding and recruiting these people. Putting out a general call for staff will usually result in receiving replies from enthusiastic individuals who are keen to do this sort of work. However, they may have difficulties in getting the support they need to do this from their institution or place of work. Conversely, going through the institution will ensure commitment from the top down but may not result in the ideal candidates being selected from within the institution.

A key decision is whether the staff will be volunteers, will include the work as part of their jobs or be paid for their contributions. Paid staff will enable gateways to set and work to targets allowing for the development of the gateway to planned and monitored. With voluntary effort gateways are relying on the goodwill of the people concerned and the ability to fit these duties around their main jobs and activities. It is quite possible that there will be very little return for the considerable investment made in training and development. Perhaps the ideal situation is to have staff who are supported by their institutions to incorporate the role into their day-to-day work. Ensuring that paid staff have protected time to carry out their gateway duties may also be an issue; it is possible that external staff have been given this additional role on top of their existing work and will find it difficult to cope with both. Good communication between the central and distributed staff can help to prevent these problems arising.

Cross reference
Subject indexing and classification

Support tools and mechanisms

Gateways need to develop a system for staff to be able to remotely recommend or catalogue into the system. Again, various methods are used by gateways; these range from emailing details of resources to central staff to Web based cataloguing systems such as ROADS.

Training

Training staff to contribute to the gateway is essential. They will require training in:

  • selection of resources
  • cataloguing and classification

Ideally this training would take place as a face-to-face workshop, although, given the possibility of contributors being located around the world, training could also take place through distance learning via email and the Web.

Documentation

Whether training is conducted remotely or face-to-face, extensive documentation is required to support the work of the staff. Various approaches are being used by existing gateways. Some have printed handbooks with all the information required; others have set up administration centres on the Web with online documentation and support.

Monitoring and support

Perhaps one of the greatest drawbacks of running a distributed team is dealing with the problems of working remotely. The job requires that staff should be self-motivated, yet it is very easy for staff to feel isolated without the advice and support of colleagues around them. A geographically dispersed team will rely heavily on remote communication through one-to-one email contact, use of mailing lists and Web conferencing systems for 'virtual meetings'.


A case study: SOSIG
 

SOSIG has successfully employed a distributed team of subject experts (known as Section Editors) for the past two years. Subject librarians from ten UK universities were appointed to select, evaluate and catalogue resources for the SOSIG catalogue. Each Section Editor is given responsibility for developing a subject area on the gateway. In some cases the Section Editors' roles are shared between two or more people at an institution, but total effort does not exceed more than one day per week.

A one-day workshop was held at the start of the project to train the staff on all aspects of working on an information gateway. This included:

  • introduction to the Scope Policy of SOSIG (this stipulates the audience and type of information to be included in the gateway)
  • finding resources on the Web
  • selecting and evaluating resources
  • cataloguing resources via the Web (including cataloguing rules)
  • introduction to SOSIG's Collection Management Policy (including guidelines on deselecting resources)

Cross reference
Quality selection, Collection management

Prior to the workshop an online administration centre was set up, which included all the tools and guidelines required to catalogue resources for the gateway. After the workshop, additional support was offered through email contact with the core staff. This one-to-one contact was initially very important as the Section Editors had a very steep learning curve to ascend. The geographical distances between the staff meant that they were very reliant on email as a means of virtual support and assistance. As the Section Editors have direct access to the live database to begin with, all of the work submitted had to be checked centrally and any errors corrected and/or reported back to the appropriate Editor. This put a very high overhead on central effort for the first few months of the scheme; however, this requirement diminished gradually and now only random checks are made on the records.

In addition to the Section Editors, SOSIG also has a number of European Correspondents. Correspondents are academics or librarians who have volunteered to submit new resources on an informal but regular basis. Correspondents have access to online training and support materials but they do not catalogue directly into the database; rather they are responsible for selecting resources and submitting the suggestions to the central team through an online form.

The responsibilities and duties for the gateway can be represented visually in two ways:

Figure 1: Workflow

Figure 1: Workflow

Figure 2: Tasks and responsibilities

Figure 2: Tasks and responsibilities

There have been various general lessons learnt in the process of establishing this distributed approach as a result of other attempts by SOSIG to encourage distributed input, which may be relevant to other gateways. These are:

  • an institutional commitment, backed by a financial arrangement, is a far more reliable way of establishing a broad range of participation than using volunteers or making financial arrangements with individuals
  • such collaborations require a great deal of co-ordinating and supporting effort from the service centre, including training, responding to queries and general reassurance as well as monitoring and encouraging effort
  • an essential ingredient has been the personal contact between the Section Editors; bringing them all together regularly for information-sharing and morale-boosting sessions has noticeably improved quantity and quality of results. Even though these face-to-face sessions are relatively expensive exercises, they have been well worth while.
E X A M P L E

Other examples of distributed cataloguing models

DutchESS

DutchESS (The Dutch Electronic Subject Service in the Netherlands) has a number of volunteer subject specialists from university libraries around the Netherlands. The subject specialists select resources and submit them to a local editor who checks the resources and edits the catalogue descriptions as appropriate. The local editors feed resources to DutchESS, where they are entered into a database. Face-to-face training for the subject librarians has been conducted. Interestingly. in this model the subject librarians involved work on this gateway as part of their day-to-day library work.

For more information see: http://www.konbib.nl/dutchess/docs/info.html#8

EELS

EELS (Engineering Electronic Library in Sweden) is an engineering subject gateway. EELS has ten Section Editors from university libraries around Sweden who volunteer to submit resources to the database. They catalogue resources directly into the database and are also able to delete records. The Section Editors receive face-to-face training in the key skills.

For more information see: http://www.ub2.lu.se/eel/about.html

EEVL

EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library in the UK) is a subject gateway to engineering information on the Internet. They have had a distributed team of academic librarians attached to the service from its inception. These librarians work voluntarily, but are part of the EEVL project consortium and so have a stake in the project. As such, they have been heavily involved in creating the selection and cataloguing process, so they have not required formal training, but they do have a printed procedures manual and regular meetings to discuss policy. The librarians can add records directly to the database, but these are checked by central staff before they are made publicly available on the gateway.

For more information see http://www.eevl.ac.uk/volunt.html

Friends of ADAM

ADAM (Art, Design, Architecture and Media Information Gateway in the UK) has created the 'Friends of ADAM' system. The Friends are a volunteer and support network from the arts and media community recruited through email, web publicity, and conferences and events. The system involves accredited online training in three areas:

  • evaluation
  • nomination
  • cataloguing

At the end of the training period volunteers are issued with a certificate of competence and can then assume different levels of responsibility in the service. Those gaining a certificate in evaluation and nomination feed their suggestions to the central team at ADAM who catalogue the resources into the database. They also assist in evaluating suggestions sent to ADAM by members of the public. Those gaining a certificate in cataloguing can create new resource descriptions which are checked by team members before being added to the central database.

For more information see: http://adam.ac.uk/friends/

Länkskafferiet (Link Larder)

The Link Larder is a database for educational use and is intended as a pedagogical aid for Swedish pupils, especially those between 10 and 15 years of age, in their search for useful information on the Internet. All the web sites are selected, quality assessed and described by eight subject editors.

For more information see: http://lankskafferiet.skolverket.se/information/brief_presentation.html



Recommendations
 

There is great potential for distributed cataloguing systems, as they open up the possibility of national or international strategies. They also provide a successful model for involving the library community in Internet resource discovery. Existing gateways have invested effort in developing systems that support the work of distributed teams, so that a librarian can work on a gateway from anywhere in the world as long as they have access to a networked PC and a Web browser. Distributed Internet cataloguing means that libraries can contribute to a shared service, rather than having each to build a local service. This is an efficient way of working, as it avoids duplicated effort and collaboration allows large-scale gateways with much better coverage to be developed.

Building and managing distributed teams is a challenge; there are a number of issues that need to be dealt with. In summary, some of these are:

  • dealing with problems of distance and feelings of isolation - constant email contact and personal feedback on work is crucial to help alleviate these problems
  • little control over individual work patterns - it is important to ensure that paid staff have protected time to carry out the work
  • monitoring consistency between staff - this is much harder in a distributed environment, but providing clear and comprehensive documentation such as selection criteria and cataloguing rules can help

Glossary
 

ADAM - Art, Design, Architecture and Media gateway
DutchESS - Dutch Electronic Subject Service
EELS - Engineering Electronic Library, Sweden
EEVL - Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library
SOSIG - The Social Science Information Gateway


References
 

DutchESS Manual: handleiding voor vakspecialisten, http://www.konbib.nl/dutchess/manual/

EELS Project, http://www.ub2.lu.se/eel/about.html

EEVL, http://www.eevl.ac.uk/volunt.html

Friends of ADAM, http://www.adam.ac.uk/friends/

Länkskafferiet (Link Larder), http://lankskafferiet.skolverket.se/information/brief_presentation.html

SOSIG Correspondents Pages, http://www.sosig.ac.uk/desire/ecorresp.html

T. Hooper, L. Huxley & P. Hollands, DESIRE: Subject-based training materials
http://www.desire.org/results/training/D8-2af.html

L. Huxley, 'DESIRE on Planet SOSIG: Training for the Distributed Internet Cataloguing Model', Ariadne 12 (1997).
http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue12/planet-sosig/

E. Worsfold, 'Distributed and Part-Automated Cataloguing: A DESIRE Issues Paper' (March 1998).
http://www.sosig.ac.uk/desire/cat/cataloguing.html


Credits
 

Chapter author: Debra Hiom

With contributions from: Rebecca Bradshaw, Roddy Macleod, Emma Place and Kate Sharp.


<< P R E V I O U S 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 N E X T >>
  Go to the table of contents  

Return to:
Handbook Home
DESIRE Home
Search | Full Glossary | All References

Last updated : 20 April 00
Contact Us
© 1999-2000 DESIRE